Thursday, April 25, 2024

Gazans search for loved ones as bulldozers unearth bodies near hospital




Gazans search for loved ones as bulldozers unearth bodies near hospital




Gaza’s Civil Defence agency said Tuesday that workers had uncovered nearly 340 bodies over several days of people killed and buried by Israeli forces at the hospital. — AFP pic

Thursday, 25 Apr 2024 8:07 AM MYT



KHAN YUNIS (Palestinian Territories), April 25 — Palestinian woman Reem Zidan had been searching for her son for months, and finally found his body on Wednesday as a bulldozer unearthed human remains outside a Gaza hospital.

“They told me to move away, but I said, ‘my son is on the bulldozer’,” Zidan told AFP from the southern Gaza city of Khan Yunis, crediting her “maternal instinct” for “knowing” it was the body of 22-year-old Nabil.


As combats subsided in Khan Yunis after Israeli forces withdrew from the area in their fight against Hamas, health workers have begun recovering bodies buried next to the city’s Nasser Hospital — southern Gaza’s largest.

“I haven’t seen him for three months, and today I found him”, Zidan said, adding that Nabil was killed by shrapnel from an Israeli air strike.


Gaza’s Civil Defence agency said Tuesday that workers had uncovered nearly 340 bodies over several days of people killed and buried by Israeli forces at the hospital.


“We were surprised that inside the Nasser Medical Complex there are mass graves made by the Israeli occupation” military, Civil Defence spokesman Mahmoud Bassal told AFP.

The Israeli army has denied troops had dug the graves.

Some parents told AFP the bodies recovered had been buried by relatives.

Unlike Zidan, others who went to the Nasser complex in hope of recovering their relatives’ bodies could not find them.

Sonia Abu Rajilah, 52, from Khan Yunis, said her son 29-year-old son Hazem was buried by his friends near the hospital, but that she and her other sons have not been able to find him.

“Now I wait among the bodies being pulled out, hoping to recognise his body,” she told AFP.

She was looking for the beige shirt and grey trousers he was wearing the last time she saw him, the mother said.

Calls for an international investigation into the deaths at Nasser Hospital have grown, including from rights group Amnesty International.

“Without proper investigations to determine how these deaths took place or what violations may have been committed, we may never find out the truth of the horrors behind these mass graves,” Erika Guevara, the rights group’s policy director, said in a statement.

Buried by relatives

Israeli government spokesman David Mencer said Wednesday that the claims the army had buried Palestinian bodies “are baseless and false”, without directly addressing allegations from Gaza’s Hamas-run authorities that Israeli troops were behind the killings.

He acknowledged that troops had examined corpses buried at the facility in their search for hostages held in Gaza.

“Bodies examined, which did not belong to Israeli hostages, were returned to their place,” Mencer said.

Army spokesman Major Nadav Shoshani said on social media platform X that “misinformation is circulating regarding a mass grave that was discovered at Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis. The grave in question was dug — by Gazans — a few months ago.”

Palestinian militants took some 250 hostages to Gaza during Hamas’s October 7 attack that triggered the war.

The attack on southern Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,170 people, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures.

Israeli officials say 129 hostages are still held in Gaza, including 34 the military says are dead.

Israel’s retaliatory offensive against Hamas in Gaza has killed 34,262 people, most of them women and children, according to the territory’s health ministry.

Intense fighting raged in mid-February in the area around Nasser Hospital, and Israeli tanks and armoured vehicles surrounded it on March 26.

Nawal al-Zaqzouq, 60, told AFP she has been coming daily to the hospital in search of her son, Alaa al-Attal, who was killed on January 1.

Attal died from bleeding after he was shot by a sniper, Zaqzouq said, and was buried by his brother at the hospital.

“We said when things calm down and there’s a ceasefire, we’ll search for him and retrieve him to bury him in the cemetery,” she said.

“But we haven’t found his body yet”. — AFP

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Have we reached a turning point?

 

Dennis Ignatius

 

~ Provoking discussion, dissent & debate on politics, diplomacy, human rights & civil society.

Have we reached a turning point?


[1] The PM is surely being disingenuous. By now, we don’t need lessons from him about the role and functions of the Pardons Board. We all know that the King has the authority and that decisions by the Pardons Board are final.

[2] The issue here is why did the government opt to hide the addendum from the public for so many weeks? And why is the PM still reluctant to either confirm or deny the existence of the addendum? How is it that both the deputy PM and the trade minister claim to have seen the addendum but not the PM? If the PM still doesn’t know, it just means that he has lost control of his own government or that he’s not being straight with the public.

[3] The PM can’t say he doesn’t want to be involved because like it or not the government is involved. After all, his AG and his Minister for Federal Territories sit on the Pardons Board. What position did they take? Did they support the pardon for Najib or not? In any case, if the addendum does exist, it is the government that must enforce it; non-involvement is not an option.

[4] At the end of the day, we are left with the distinct impression that the government has behaved dishonestly and deviously. The PM himself has not been transparent and honest with the people. The impression we are left with is that for political reasons he quietly supported a deal for Najib and is now hiding behind the Pardons Board to escape the consequences of his actions.

[5] He can try all he wants to distance himself from what is turning out to be a very ugly and disastrous political fiasco, but there’s no escaping the fact that his actions and non-actions have shattered what’s left of his credibility along with that of his government. This may well be a turning point in how the people view this government.

[Dennis Ignatius |Kuala Lumpur |22nd April 2024]

Critical point failure could be a factor in the helicopter collision - Expert


Sinar Daily:

Critical point failure could be a factor in the helicopter collision - Expert


Logbook scrutiny key to unveiling cause of helicopter tragedy

24 Apr 2024 08:37am









The crash occurred at a naval base in Lumut, Perak. - Photo by Bernama


KUALA LUMPUR - The fatal collision or two Royal Malaysian Navy helicopters that killed 10 personnel abroad could be due to the failure of critical points of their aircraft structure, aviation expert Assoc Prof Maj Dr Mohd Harridon Mohamed Suffian said.😂😂😂

The Universiti Kuala Lumpur (UniKL) Search and Rescue Aviation Unit chief said that if a critical point of an aircraft was affected by certain factors, it would cause the aircraft to lose its aerodynamics.

"That’s why it might not have been able to carry out auto rotation, Usually if a helicopter loses an engine it could carry out auto rotation to land safely, cut land, cut on earth but maybe it hit the critical point, which degraded the aerodynamic rate.

"As there is no more optimum aerodynamics, the aircraft will sway to the left and right and not fly with the optimum trajectory and cause it to crash land,” he said on Bernama TV’s progrmame Malaysia Petang Ini yesterday.

On the Investigation Board set up to identify the cause of the collision, he said he expected the report about the matter would be issued in phases, with a preliminary report and a comprehensive report.

"Maybe in the first phase there will be general information or some discreet information about what happened and the crew members, including their behaviour at that time.

"They will visit the crash site to gather key components or pieces to be brought to the lab for them to figure out the intensity of the crash while in flight and through this method they will submit a preliminary report,” Mohd Harridon said.

The comprehensive report will involve the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) that will have further assessment of the data from the lab.


“Respect the time” – Kedah State Govt Tells Pasar Malam Vendors to Pause Operations During Maghrib Prayer Time





“Respect the time” – Kedah State Govt Tells Pasar Malam Vendors to Pause Operations During Maghrib Prayer Time


April 24, 2024
By Azri Azizan



Source: Kosmo & 123RF


The Kedah state government is taking measures to make sure the prayer time is utilised for the purpose.

In a statement released by the State’s Housing, Local Government and Health Committee on its Facebook page, ALL night market hawkers in Kedah are ordered to temporarily stop business operations to respect prayer time at dusk, effective 1 May. The prayer at dusk, also known as Maghrib prayer generally takes place around 7:25 pm in Kedah.



Source: 123RF
For illustration purposes only



As for the pause time, it won’t take too long, according to the authority.

“The period starts 5 minutes before the Maghrib prayer, and ends 10 minutes after the prayer time.”

Notices have been given to all night market vendors in the state and they have been asked to comply with the new instructions.



Source: 123RF
For illustration purposes only



There is a reason why the notice was issued. According to the authorities, they explained that they are giving space and time to perform their prayers, as well as respecting the prayer time.




Source: Facebook | Majlis Perbandaran Kulim


Previously, notifications were sent to night market vendors around the Kulim area in Kedah. The direction was issued by the Chairman of the Kulim Municipal Council through the community regarding the directive.


Ops Lalang: Ex-ISA detainees want govt to apologise








Ops Lalang: Ex-ISA detainees want govt to apologise

Published: Apr 24, 2024 9:03 AM


Nearly all former detainees under the 1987 Ops Lalang who spoke to Malaysiakini agree with the recent call by former Court of Appeal judge Hishamudin Yunus for the government to apologise for their detention under the Internal Security Act 1960.

Parti Sosialis Malaysia leader and labour activist Dr Nasir Hashim also concurred with the sentiment that the government should apologise even though many years have passed.

“I agree. Even though time has passed, the wounds of cruelty, violence, and injustice cannot be easily forgotten.

“In order to protect their bread and butter, as well as their positions, the judiciary, administration, political leaders, newspapers, RTM, and security forces conspired under the thumb of (the then prime minister) Dr Mahathir Mohamad to sacrifice and victimise us as long as their cracks (the tensions within Umno at the time) could be neatly covered up,” said Nasir, who previously served as deputy dean of UKM's Faculty of Medicine.

Under Mahathir’s first stint as prime minister, 106 activists, journalists, and opposition politicians were detained without trial in November 1987.


Parti Sosialis Malaysia leader and labour activist Dr Nasir Hashim


Ops Lalang took place at a time when Umno was split into two camps, with Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah challenging Mahathir for the Umno presidency in the 1987 party election.

Meanwhile, Nasir said many victims of detention without trial suffered severe trauma, including himself.

“Many ISA victims faced trauma, becoming paranoid and cautious to the point of becoming unable to engage with society. Many ISA victims also easily forget, even praising and supporting Mahathir again in order to seek political positions.”

The ISA was abolished in 2012 and replaced by the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act.

Since its enactment in 1960, it was reported that more than 10,000 people had been arrested and detained under the ISA.

Before its abolition, the ISA was criticised for alleged abuse of power, torture, and denial of detainees’ rights including access to lawyers and family members.


Dark History


Hishamudin had also delivered key judgments regarding ISA when he was a high court judge, including his 2007 decision to award RM2.5 million in damages to political activist Abdul Malek Hussin for being unlawfully detained and the injuries he suffered.

However, the Federal Court later ruled that Malek’s detention under the ISA was valid and he had to pay RM50,000 in costs.

In 2010, Hishamudin ordered that RM3.3 million be paid to former ISA detainee, businessperson Badrul Zaman PS Mohamed, and the court agreed that his 1994 detention was unlawful and unconstitutional.


Former Court of Appeal judge Hishamudin Yunus


In a series of cases involving the former ISA detainee Abdul Ghani Haroon, Hishamudin made landmark decisions including that habeas corpus applicants have the right to be present in court during proceedings.

Unfortunately, this was overruled by the Federal Court, which took a literal interpretation of Article 5(2) of the Federal Constitution.

Meanwhile, Women's Aid Organisation activist Irene Xavier, who was also a former Ops Lalang detainee, said it would be good for the government to apologise as the mass arrests without trial were a black mark on Malaysia’s history.

“So, if the government officially apologises to us (for what happened before), it is closed in a good way.

“That’s because victims of the detention had to face many problems. Some of us faced difficulties getting their jobs back, and so I think it’d be good for the government to apologise to us,” she said.

“I am open to accepting the apology but I hope it doesn't happen again,” she added.


Provide compensation

Meanwhile, former chemical engineering professor Tan Ka Kheng said the government should provide compensation to former Ops Lalang detainees in line with the compensation amount set by the Federal Court in a case involving five Reformasi activists.

In the 2016 decision, the Federal Court ordered the government to pay damages to former Batu MP Chua Tian Chang or Tian Chua, former Hulu Kelang assemblyperson Saari Sungib, activist Hishamuddin Rais, former PKR supreme council member Badrul Amin Baharom, and Badaruddin Ismail, amounting to RM10,000 for each day they spent under ISA detention in 2001.

The court had ruled that their detention was unlawful.

“The government should apologise to the victims of Ops Lalang and the nation because it led to a ‘dictatorial’ rule and the destruction of major public institutions and state governance, and was a serious assault on the intellectual community,” Tan told Malaysiakini.

“Ops Lalang allowed the ‘dictator’ to practice money politics and racial policies that divided the people, which has become a culture afflicting politicians and politics in Malaysia to this day,” he said in a WhatsApp message.

Before his detention under Ops Lalang, Tan was a lecturer at Universiti Pertanian Malaysia (now Universiti Putra Malaysia) and was involved in the committee protesting against rare earth processing in Bukit Merah, Perak, which was alleged to have caused the radioactive poisoning of residents.

However, former Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali, who was detained twice under the ISA for his involvement in the 1974 student movement and Umno politics in 1987, had a different view.

Ibrahim told Malaysiakini that Hishamudin’s call was merely his personal opinion.

“That’s just his view. In my view, we have to look at Ops Lalang from a national security perspective. The Court of Appeal judge looked at it from the point of law.

“The point of law and national security cannot be equated at times,” said Ibrahim, who at the time was an Umno Youth exco member.

Ibrahim said although he was a victim of Ops Lalang, he still believes the ISA detentions were carried out to prevent chaos.

“They were not yet involved but had the potential, meaning all parties were detained to ensure there were no individuals who could continue to fuel this racial tension,” he explained, referring to preventive laws on potential crimes that have yet to be committed.


‘Apologise to all ISA detainees’

Meanwhile, academic and political figure Syed Husin Ali questioned why the government should only apologise to Ops Lalang’s former ISA detainees.


Academic and political figure Syed Husin Ali


“I don't understand why there needs to be an apology only for the ISA detentions under Ops Lalang.

“Why not include the students, lecturers, and children who were detained under the ISA during the Baling incident?

“In fact, why not apologise to all ISA detainees? Moreover, the ISA has been abolished,” said Syed Husin, who was detained under the ISA from 1974 to 1980 for fighting for the plight of poor farmers in Baling, Kedah.

As for book publisher Chong Ton Sin, an apology from the government would show regret for past mistakes.

“For me, whether they apologise or not is in the past, but if they do want to apologise, it's still good because at least they realise they were wrong.

“Apologising also proves they were guilty because if they weren't wrong, why apologise? One cannot simply arrest innocent people,” he said.

Chong was arrested in 1968 as a teenager and spent eight years in detention without trial.

“But what the victims have endured cannot possibly be forgotten, and some have died. The pain and fear their families have endured cannot possibly be erased,” he added.


***

kt comments:

Git that blardy old coot before he leaves us for good


Protesting against slaughter – as students in the US are doing – isn’t antisemitism

 

Guardian:


Protesting against slaughter – as students in the US are doing – isn’t antisemitism

Robert Reich

Education is all about provocation. Without being provoked even young minds can remain stuck in old tracks

The most important thing I teach my students is to seek out people who disagree with them.

That’s because the essence of learning is testing one’s ideas, assumptions and values. And what better place to test ideas, assumptions and values than at a university?

Apparently, Columbia University’s president, Minouche Shafik, does not share my view. Last week she prostrated herself before House Republicans, promising that she would discipline professors and students for protesting against the ongoing slaughter in Gaza in which some 34,000 people have died, most of them women and children.

The following day she summoned the New York police department to arrest more than 100 students who were engaging in a peaceful protest.

Can we be clear about a few things? Protesting against this slaughter is not expressing antisemitism. It is not engaging in hate speech. It is not endangering Jewish students. It is doing what should be done on a college campus – taking a stand against a perceived wrong, thereby provoking discussion and debate.

Education is all about provocation. Without being provoked – stirred, unsettled, goaded – even young minds can remain stuck in old tracks.

The Israel-Hamas war is horrifying. The atrocities committed by both sides illustrate the capacities of human beings for inhumanity and show the vile consequences of hate. For these reasons, it presents an opportunity for students to re-examine their preconceptions and learn from one another.

If Columbia or any other university now roiled by student protests were doing what it should be doing, it would be a hotbed of debate about the war. Disagreement would be welcome; demonstrations accepted; argument invited; differences examined.

The mission of a university is to coach students in how to learn, not tell them what to think. It is to invite debate, not suppress it. Truth is a process and method – more verb than noun.

I love it when my students take issue with something that I or another student has said, starting with “I disagree!” and then explaining why. Disagreeing is not being disagreeable. Disagreement engenders thought and discussion. It challenges students to reconsider their positions and investigate more deeply.

Which is why universities should encourage and protect unpopular views. It’s why unpopular speakers should be invited and welcomed to campus.

It’s also why students should not be shielded from what are often carelessly termed “micro-aggressions”. To be riled up is to be attentive, open to new ideas.

And why peaceful demonstrations should be encouraged, not shut down. It is never appropriate to call in armed police to arrest peaceful student demonstrators.

Finally, it’s why universities should go out of their way to tolerate expression that may make some people uncomfortable. To tar all offensive speech “hate speech” and ban it removes a central pillar of education. Of course, it’s offensive. It is designed to offend.

There is a limit, of course. Expression that targets specific students, “doxes” them, or otherwise aims to hurt them as individuals doesn’t invite learning. It is a form of intimidation. It should not be allowed.

skip past newsletter promotion

I’m old enough, and have been a professor long enough, to have seen campuses explode in rage – at bigots like George Wallace when he ran for president, at the horrors of the Vietnam war, at university investments in South Africa and at efforts to prevent free speech.

Some of these protests were loud. Some caused inconvenience. Some protesters took over university buildings. But most were not violent. Nor did they seek to harm or intimidate individual students.

Whenever university presidents have brought in the police, and students have been arrested and suspended, all learning has stopped.

Which brings me to the central role of university faculties in protecting free expression on campus.

That role is especially critical now, when the jobs of university presidents and trustees have degenerated mainly into fundraising – often from wealthy alumni who have their own myopic views about what sorts of speech should be allowed and what should be barred.

The faculty of Columbia University has every right – and, in my view, a duty – to protect peaceful free expression at Columbia with a vote of no confidence in Shafik’s leadership and seek to have her presidency terminated.

The faculties of Yale, NYU and other campuses now engulfed in protests about what is occurring in Gaza should do everything in their power to use the resulting provocations, inconveniences and discomforts as occasions for learning rather than repression.