Friday, December 15, 2017

Another King Fruit


Fruits of their labour: Ahmad Shabery Chek putting a pineapple on an arch after launching the Malaysian Pineapple Industry Board's 60th Anniversary Pineapple Fiesta at the Pontian Trade Centre, Johor. 

Top Pineapple Producing Countries

RankCountryPineapple Production (in thousand metric tonnes)
1Costa Rica26853.13 2685.131
2Brazil2483.83
3Philippines2458.42
4Thailand2209.35
5Indonesia1837.16
6India1571.00
7Nigeria1420.00
8China1386.36
9Mexico771.94
10Columbia643.04

The above statistics have been true up to April this year.


The first top 4 each supply approximately 10% of the world's requirements.

Malaysia produces 412,720 metric tons per year, about less than a fifth of above top countries like Costa Rica and our neighbour Philippines and Thailand.

And now we read in The Star Online that China pines for Malaysian pineapples (clever pun by Star reporter Yee Xiang Yun) that apart from the Gua Musang King durians, the Chinese (the ones in China, that is, wakakaka) are also crazy for Malaysia’s fresh MD2 type pineapples.




It seems those fruits-crazy Chinese (the ones in China, wakakaka) want about 100 tonnes each week but Malaysia was only able to provide about 60 tonnes.

When I was a kid I studied that Malaysia was No 2 globally in pineapple production and second only to the USA (Hawaii). It seems now that both Malaysia and the USA have disappeared from the list of top 10 pineapple-producers.


Antigua Black Pineapple: The World's Sweetest.

When the Arawak migrated to the Caribbean from South America in the 17th century, they brought with them what would become the official fruit of Antigua, the Black Pineapple.
 

Pineapples are popular with Chinese, especially in Penang, during Chinese New Year as the word 'pineapple' in Penang Hokkien is 'Ong-Lai' which sounds like 'Prosperity-Comes', a good pun for luck.

Hence one will see a pineapple or pineapples as votive offering to Shen (Chinese native or folk religion gods) and ancestors during worship.


In recent times (in fact early this year), I notice that Chinese, in particular Cantonese, cut a fresh pineapples at their ancestors' tombs during Qing Ming, placing the decapitated crown on top of the tombstone and the skins cast widely over the grave.

This must be a recent modernised improvisation of the 'Ong-Lai' pun as the ritual did not exist during my kiddy days, or at least in Penang which were chiefly populated by Hokkiens and Teochoews.


Revenge of the "Zombie Blur-Sotongs'?

MM Online - Perak woman gets jail time, fine for mocking Islam:


and may God save the Queen, wakakaka 

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 15 — A housewife was sentenced to six months' jail today after she was convicted of demeaning Islam outside an Ulu Kinta mosque last year.

According to national news agency Bernama, a magistrates court in Ipoh also fined 46-year-old Tham Yut Mooi RM5,000 for each of her three charges under Section 298 of the Penal Code.

She allegedly committed the offence outside the Abu Ubaidah mosque in Ulu Kinta on May 4, 2016.

CK, is she your aunt or sister? Wakakaka.

Tell her not to worry about being lonely in jail as one day you may join her with your vile abuses against 'blur sotongs' and 'zombies', wakakaka again.

However, I would also like to see those who chucked a kepala kerbau in front of an Indian temple get the same court punishments as well.

And don't forget Ann Wan Seng. Ann was (is?) an ustaz and a member of Perkim national council.

Somehow, like his better known gene-denying twin, instead of doing his work for Islam and Perkim without insulting other races or religions, he just had to insult the non-Muslim non-Christian Chinese, presumably for the same self aggrandizing self interests.

But he did it in a pitiful ignorant way, testifying to his abysmal ignorance on a topic he set out to insult, a typically dubious hallmark of his BTN-ized Boleh-ness but more of Bodoh-ness.


Ustaz King Kong Know-Nothing 

Sometime back in 2010, he delivered a speech to deliberately insult the non-Muslim non-Christian Chinese, specifically the Buddhists.

He pompously and grandstandingly attempted to ingratiate himself with a congregation of Malay-Muslims with his speech to them as follows:

Bukan sekadar orang Cina menyembah agama Buddha. Mereka juga sembah berbagai dewa dan juga dewi. Mereka sembah Tua Pek Kong, mereka sembah Pau Kong, mereka sembah Datuk Kong dan barangkali mereka juga sembah King Kong.

Maka jadilah agama dia agama Kong Kali Kong.

Dan inilah keadaan yang sedia wujud itu di mana orang Cina sembah patung-patung ini kerana mereka yakin dan juga mereka percaya bahawa patung ini boleh mendatangkan kebaikan kepada mereka, boleh mendatangkan kesejahteraan kepada mereka, boleh memberikan keselamatan malahan boleh menjadikan mereka ini kaya-raya.

Sadly, the ignoramus' ignorant religious bigotry drew the desired laughter, sniggers, giggles from his rapt audience who weren't aware of the religious fact that Buddhists, unlike many other religions specifically the Abrahamic religions, have NO almighty creator god or gods.




Yes, Buddhists (and Jainists, Confucianists, and to a certain extent Taoists, as there are some Taoists who have confusingly conflated Taosim with Shenism) don’t give two figs about god or gods because the way to Nirvana or Enlightenment (end of their sufferings through zillions of rebirths) must be and can only be achieved through their own efforts.

Thus God or gods would be completely irrelevant to their religious beliefs.



They leave Kong Kali Kong to the bigoted ignorant imagination of Ustaz Ann Wan Seng.

What about poor kaytee who has annoyed many of my readers with his anti religious posts, wakakaka?

If you care to note, kaytee is never anti any religion per se, but only personalities in religion whether today (
Ustaz Ann Wan Seng, JAWI, JAKIM, etc) or yester-years (Judah, King David, Mahabharata personalities like Drona, etc).




let's look at above image and re-examine 2 Samuel 12, as follows:

Then the LORD sent Nathan to David. And he came to him and said,
“There were two men in one city, the one rich and the other poor.

“The rich man had a great many flocks and herds.

“But the poor man had nothing except one little ewe lamb
Which he bought and nourished;
And it grew up together with him and his children.
It would eat of his bread and drink of his cup and lie in his bosom,
And was like a daughter to him.

“Now a traveler came to the rich man,
And he was unwilling to take from his own flock or his own herd,
To prepare for the wayfarer who had come to him;
Rather he took the poor man’s ewe lamb and prepared it for the man who had come to him.”


Then David’s anger burned greatly against the man, and he said to Nathan, “As the LORD lives, surely the man who has done this deserves to die. “He must make restitution for the lamb fourfold, because he did this thing and had no compassion.”

     Nathan then said to David, “You are the man! Thus says the LORD God of Israel, ‘It is I who anointed you king over Israel and it is I who delivered you from the hand of Saul.

‘I also gave you your master’s house and your master’s wives into your care, and I gave you the house of Israel and Judah; and if that had been too little, I would have added to you many more things like these!

‘Why have you despised the word of the LORD by doing evil in His sight? You have struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword, have taken his wife to be your wife, and have killed him with the sword of the sons of Ammon.

‘Now therefore, the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised Me and have taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your wife.’

Such was just one of the evil acts of King David.

But what about the Mahabharata?

As just one example, I was annoyed by the racist-caste-consciousness of Drona, in the story of Ekalavya in the Mahabharata, which troubled me as much as the story of Hang Tuah unjustly (or stupidly) killing his best friend and sworn brother-in-arms (and that by deceit too) on the say-so of the Sultan whose unjust persecution of Tuah had ironically been the very reason for Jebat rebelling against the tyrannical ruler.

Ekalavya idolised Drona, who was the ultimate sifu (martial art master) who had taught martial arts and magic to both the Pandava and their cousins the Kaurava, the two principal warring foes in the epic.

But Drona refused to accept Ekalavya as his student because the latter was a low caste person. Yes, the Mahabharata reeks throughout of despicable caste discrimination and class snobbery.

righteous (but stupid) Ekalavya giving his right thumb to a caste-conscious discriminatory and sinister Drona 

Yet Ekalavya despite his low caste disadvantage practised diligently by himself with only Drona as his inspiration, becoming the best archer in the epic.

But Drona was out to get him as he subsequently revealed his sinister upper caste discriminatory reason to his fave student Arjuna on why he had Ekalavya cut off the latter's own thumb:
"What would happen to society if the lower castes start learning the martial arts reserved for Kshatrias? I had to do this to preserve stability and social order. My goal is to make you the best archer in the world and remove all barriers towards that goal."

You may want to know why Ekalavya willingly cut off his own thumb to give it to an asshole like Drona even if that act caused the silly bloke to lose his supreme skills in archery?

Well, that's almost the same question you would ask on why Tuah killed his best mate Jebat for a tyrannical ruler.

Intrigues after intrigues - another Mahathir-Anwar story

FMT - Dr M has no interest in Anwar’s release, says Reformasi veteran (extracts):


A pioneer Reformasi activist has questioned the sincerity of Dr Mahathir Mohamad in calling for the release of former opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim.

Abdul Razak Ismail had been part of the Reformasi movement since its inception in 1998, following the sacking of Anwar as deputy prime minister and Umno deputy president, when Mahathir headed both the party and the government.

He said that he believes that the former prime minister does not have any interest in pushing for the release of jailed opposition leader Anwar. [...]


Razak, who was secretary of the Otai Reformasi 1998 NGO before quitting his post to become an ordinary member, lamented how the opposition coalition had welcomed Mahathir into their fold.

“The whole idea of Mahathir’s name being on the statement looked more like PH’s gimmick of wanting to bring Mahathir into the picture.

“If that’s what they’re trying to do, it’s bad ‘advertising’,” Razak said, adding that it seemed a moot point to have Mahathir release the statement when Anwar is set to be free in a matter of months anyway having served most of his jail term.

“Moreover, Mahathir doesn’t have to fight for Anwar’s release because his jail term is anticipated to end next year June.

“In fact, I hear rumours of Prime Minister Najib Razak wanting to release Anwar earlier but keep him under house arrest, just to get back at Mahathir.

“So this statement Mahathir made doesn’t carry any weight and won’t make any difference,” Razak said.



Wakakaka, it doesn't take rocket science to know that Mahathir has zero interest in getting Anwar Ibrahim released.

Once Mahathir hated only one person but today he hates two blokes with deep deep deepest vengeance. They are Najib Razak and Anwar Ibrahim. 

He hates Najib for refusing to obey his dictates and ignoring him, failing to report to him, etc.

And he hates Anwar for trying to oust him in 1997-8.


Once Mahathir hates you with a giant-size HATRED, he never forgets, thus for him to join US human rights lawyer Kimberley Motley in calling for the release of Anwar Ibrahim is hardly plausible, apart from a gesture that's hardly likely to receive any attention from Najib.

But as Abdul Razak Ismail said, that implausibility looked more like Pakatan Harapan’s gimmick of wanting to bring Mahathir into the picture, though we do not know who in PH dreamed up that personal-political incongruity.

I wonder whether it could have been one of PKR's strategic-thinkers like Rafizi? Nurul? or even the outside-of-PKR LKS? Wakakaka. But Abdul Razak Ismail assessed it as a bad move.

But maybe that it would in the end be a meaningless gesture for Mahathir to call for Anwar to be released, an unwinnable move hardly likely to gain traction with the authorities, that saw Mahathir willing to participate in that useless act of tokenism, wakakaka.


Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is not qualified to become Selangor menteri besar as his struggle is solely to become the prime minister, said Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

"I think he (Anwar) is not qualified to become menteri besar, he formed a party purely to ensure he becomes prime minister, not to fight for race, religion and nation.

"Everywhere he struggles, it is also only to become prime minister, enter Umno (before) is also because he wanted to be prime minister, not to fight for Umno," said the former prime minister.

He was speaking to reporters after the launch of the Tun Mahathir Perdana Global Peace Foundation (PGPF) Chair for Global Peace at the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) here, Tuesday. [...]

Dr Mahathir, who is also PGPF president, said he was "afraid" the people of Selangor would not be safe if Anwar became its menteri besar.

"Of course, I have fear because the people would not be safe, the staff will not be safe with him around, you see what happened to his staff? He will be more influenced by his freedom to do whatever he likes."

He thinks as prime minister, probably he will be above the law, you are not above the law, if you commit anything wrong, (or if) you are immoral, the government will take action against you,"


- source 'Malaysian Digest'

But Abdul Razak Ismail revealed a juicy lil' nugget of information, that he heard rumours of Prime Minister Najib Razak wanting to release Anwar earlier but keep him under house arrest, just to get back at Mahathir.

That rumour, while still a rumour, might not be completely baseless as Anwar’s release is anticipated to end next year June, just a mere 6 months away. Early releases for good behaviour or on political amnesty are not uncommon. Najib might also have considered an early release of Anwar as a bit of pre-election good-will 'sales gimmick'.

If indeed this rumour has grounds, then the 'bright spark' in PH who dreamt up the meaningless but politically-profitable -to-PH gesture of having Mahathir request for Anwar's release together with US lawyer Kimberley Motley, has instead f* Anwar up by instigating Najib to allegedly frustrate Mahathir deliberately, in showing the Old Man 'siapa raja'.

Wah, the intrigues of Malay politics ... but which sometimes ended up in burnt satay, sodomy and hypothetically 'unnecessary extra days' in jail for Anwar.




Thursday, December 14, 2017

Shafted twice

In Hollywood Salma Hayek talked about her perverted 'monster' she had the misfortune to encounter.


In Malaysia, 'someone' talked about his misfortune to have been 'shafted' TWICE, the first time physically and the second time, morally/ethically.



I asked him which was worst, being shafted physically or being shafted morally/ethically?

He replied: I was physically embraced when shafted the first time but morally abandoned in the second.




Hamsap test for Members of Parliament

MM Online - Covering up stewardesses won’t stop plane crashes (extracts):

by Erna Mahyuni


I propose a ban on certain subjects from ever being brought up in the Dewan e.g. sitting members' menstrual cycles, Malaysia Book of Records and what our stewardesses are wearing.

Someone has apparently been calling for “shariah-compliant” uniforms for stewardesses.

One, there is no such thing as “shariah-compliant.” It is a made-up term that is nonsensical and theologically problematic.

Two, can hamsapness in general just be banned from the Dewan? 


'dirty-minded' or 'pervert' would be more correct

Seriously-lah, if instead of work, you're fixated on what stewardesses are wearing when you're on business trips, you should be banned from airplanes. Forever.

Cabin crew are just that ― cabin crew. Poor souls who not only have to look presentable even when jetlagged and cooped up in a cramped metal bird, but have to babysit a whole plane of passengers. [...]

The nonsensical assumption that God punishes airlines who don't follow God's rules are ridiculous. Again, it's theologically problematic and unsound. Plenty of women who do not dress immodestly are raped ― as are senior citizens, children and the physically and mentally challenged.

That's enough proof that modest clothing does not deter or hinder rape. Let's not forget the high incidence of rape in Saudi where women aren't allowed to walk around uncovered in the first place.

Our politicians should be kept busy with other things instead of stewardess uniforms. If their eyes roam to improper locations, it's not the stewardesses who need to be censured.


On that note it's time society gets with the 21st century and properly educate men on the need to keep their eyes and hands to appropriate places. No touching, no looking, no unasked for wardrobe suggestions.

At this point, I think we should just come up with a hamsap test all elected reps must take before serving. Anyone who fails should not be allowed to serve, end of story.

Then maybe we'll have MPs who show up to talk about their jobs instead of air hostess' bodies.

Indeed.
10 years ago at an UMNO general assembly, one of UMNO aspirant-wannabes, then known as the tebuan keeper for his references to May 13 and warnings nto non-Malays not to kacau a tebuan nest, Badruddin Amiruldin failed the hamsap test badly, wakakaka.

At that general assembly, Wanita Umno Kubang Kerian chief Zaleha Hussin presumably felt she needed to make some kind of impact at the gathering. Poor dear, as we all know it’s a competitive world in UMNO as the party’s pyramidal structure gets narrower and narrower as one approached the top

Though there were plenty of important pressing material for discussions at such forum, what with the nation still reeling from corruption, crimes and cronyism (all three ‘c’ could well be inter-related), and prices inflating like chapattis heated on pans, and young little girls murdered before they reached 10, Zaleha decided …….. get this …….. to attack the uniform of AirAsia air stewardesses.


Malaysiakini reported that at the UMNO annual assembly Wanita delegate sees red over AirAsia uniform.

The women delegates to the annual general assembly of mighty political juggernaut UMNO discussed "in depth, and with strong words" (wakakaka), the AirAsia uniform for female cabin crew as ‘embarrassing’ to women.

She gasped: “Legs, knees and thighs are exposed for all to see. This is an embarrassment to women. Something must be done.”

She raised the matter during the debate on a motion on social issues and religion. And guess who was the Chairperson of the debate?

Yes, Badruddin Amiruldin. The exchange between those two mighty mickey mouse midgets went as follows:

Zaleha: The provocative uniform must be changed to something reflective of Eastern values and which complies with the values of Islam.

Badruddin: I think their skirts are too short.

Zaleha: Cloth can be bought.

Badruddin: I think they don’t have enough cloth.

I suppose one could admit the debate was 'profound' (wakakaka) ........ well, in UMNO's pathetic but pompous philosophy.

Zaleha: She [referring to her ‘embarrassed’ friend] said a flight attendant sat in front of her and she could see her legs, thighs and knees. She was so embarrassed!

Badruddin: Did she see the tunnel?

And the UMNO crowd roared with laughter and approval at that disgraceful puerile salacious remark by the Chairperson of an UMNO forum on social issues and religion. Now you know why some UMNO  blokes get away with such outrageous idiotic nonsense.


Around that time (10 years ago), UMNO MPs Mohd Said Yusof and Bung Mokhtar Radin harassed DAP MP Fong Po Kuan by uttering sexist remarks of the bocor kind in Parliament, which led me to post MP's menstruation mesmerised motherless monkeys.

Sadly, no lady MP from Barisan Nasional protested against their unparliamentary intrusive pariah-ish comments on Fong Po Kuan's menstruation.

But when Fong, the lady directly insulted by those crude crass comments called for a motion under the Standing Order 26 (1P) to refer the two BN MPs to the Committee of Privileges, Speaker Ramli Ngah Talib (predictably) dismissed the motion.


she's bocor-ing? wow 

This was what renowned Malaysian philosopher Dodgee Dimsum ;-) had to say about the DAP insensitivity for making mountains out of ‘puddles’ - read Apology - A letter to the minister.

As mentioned, menstruation is more commonly referred to as ‘monthly period’. It seems it’s governed by the lunar cycle, which may explain why it makes some UMNO MPs mad (lunatic, you know, from the word ‘lunar’) or alternatively, hamsap, wakakaka.




Two Old Men decide Malaysia's future

Note I did not say Two grumpy old men, wakakaka,


but two old men.


roses are red Hadi
budu does stink like you

sugar is sweet Maddy
muthu samba rice is you

The covert but (wakakaka) open secret alliance between UMNO and PAS is supposed to help BN (effectively UMNO) win GE-14 and retain control of the government. On top of Najib-Hadi's 'bisa diatur bapak', Hadi Awang dislikes Mahathir for a number of reasons, thus is willing to contest against anything Mahathir stands for.

But the PAS-UMNO 'understanding' will depend largely on Hadi Awang. However, Hadi has been ailing so if he leaves us prior to GE-14, the other PAS leaders may have completely different ideas of political alliance and may break PAS' covert 'understanding' with UMNO.

Thus Najib may find himself in deep shit. He has to sembahyang ... ooops ... I mean bersolat to ensure Hadi lives until past GE-14.

On the other side, Mahathir is supposed to help Pakatan Harapan win GE-14 by penetrating the Heartland and win over its massive voting bloc.

But that will depend largely on Mahathir's kamcheng with the Heartland. However, Mahathir's past records won't be enough as he has recently riled the royals, in the specific case of his unspoken but quite apparent war with HRH Sultan Selangor.


HM Sultan Johor has not been impressed with Mahathir as well.


Some may say 'so what', but with the Heartland, allegiance to the liege lords (Sultans) is a big thing a la 'biar mati anak jangan mati adat'.

Thus if the heartland is revolted and repulsed by Mahathir's very insolent attitude towards HRH Sultan Selangor, his sole usefulness to Pakatan becomes a dead fish.

But has Mahathir burned his bridges with the royals? On the surface of it I would say 'aye' as no Malay would have the insolent biadab-ness to return a high award conferred by HRH, more so after a chiding by HRH, when Mahathir could have just tender a mere apology.

Instead, Mahathir demonstrates he is a hubristic man who will never apologise for his wrong or insolence to man or king, such is his vital need to hold on to the last vestige of his own esteem.


Maybe HRH Sultan Selangor has been correct that Mahathir suffers from deep inferiority complex.

But will Hadi Awang hold on until GE-14 is over?

So the battle for GE-14 lies in the hands of two old man, one of whom has already f* it up quite kaukau. Thus Pakatan Harapan can only hope Hadi Awang leaves us pretty pronto.


Wednesday, December 13, 2017

In the name of Islam?

Malaysiakini - S'gor Sultan wants a halt to condoning of murder as 'jihad' (extracts):


Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah said he has been informed of people who condone murder as a form of jihad and wants such extremism to be curbed.
Addressing a gathering of imams in the state at Istana Alam Shah in Klang today, the ruler also emphasised the role of mosques in curbing such beliefs.

"I was informed that there are certain groups among Muslims who have deviated from the true teachings of Islam, to an extent that they take murder as a form of jihad demanded by Allah.

"Such belief and followings, if allowed to fester, are very dangerous and could lead to killings and split among Muslims, as seen in the Gulf states recently," he said.


Good on you, Tuanku or in more polite Malay protocol, Daulat Tuanku, but please ampun patik for a casual 'good on you' as patik is a mere blogger from Penang.

Murder is a terrible crime within any community of mankind, where one dares to end someone's life by violent means and disguises it as a fight for Islam.

But criminals have been known to be unscrupulous in 'dropping names' such as that of Allah swt in their intention to commit crimes.

Some 15 years ago in Pakistan, the most horrid story I had the misfortune to read went as follows: Two clans lived in a village in Pakistan. Call them clans A (for aggressor) and V (victim) respectively.

Apparently A-clan was of a higher caste than V-clan, though I wonder how the hell (excuse my blasphemy) the evil caste system could have existed in the claimed egalitarian society of the Islamic world.

One bastard from A-clan sodomised a 12-year boy from V-clan - I'm sure Malaysians are familiar with the term 'sodomised' so I won't bother to explain what's that.

As if that was not enough for that lustful beast, he and his clansmen (of A-clan) fabricated a story that the 12-year old sodomised victim (from V-clan) had illicit sex with a 30-year old woman from A-clan, which was a no-no because of the caste bull$h*t and not so much khalwat.

They (A-clan) took the issue to the village elders of their clan, who, would you believe, were coincidentally made up of even worst lustful beasts - 'A' now stands for @r$ehole$.

The tribal council passed a sentence of ‘revenge rape’ in a land where full syariah law was in force but apparently not enforced for some clans.

Was the decision of that council syariah-complaint in inventing a sentence obviously set up for the base gratification of lustful beasts?

The victim chosen from V-clan to receive the 'revenge rape' was Mukhtaran Mai (or Bibi), the sister of the boy. She was gang-raped by bearded beasts from A-clan including a couple of the lustful tribal council members, who must have dropped their trousers even as they passed the sentence.


Honour? 

Thus she was sexually brutalised on a fabricated case, AFTER her 12 year old brother was already sodomised by a beast from A-clan. As an atheist I nonetheless 'pray' we will never succumb to that sort of sentencing of 'revenge rape' despite Pakistan being supposedly fully syariah compliant. 

I'll leave that sordid affair in which the Pakistan government (at that time) was an utter disgrace, and move on to 
Muslim village in West Bengal state (India).

Ten years ago Aftab Ansari dreamed he uttered the Islamic word for divorce, ‘talaq’, three times in his sleep. His wife on hearing the dreaded word was worried and quietly discussed the matter with her friends. Soon the news spread through the village.

Under Islamic law, a husband needs only say 'talaq' or ‘I divorce you’ three times to secure a permanent end to his marriage.

So the leaders in the couple's Muslim village were consulted. Those ‘wise’ leaders decreed that Ansari's unconscious utterances constituted a divorce.

Hmmm, why would they do so?

Aha, the reason became clear when they issued further instructions, which pissed off Aftab Ansari and his wife.

Those ‘wise’ religious leaders pronounced that, if Aftab wants to remarry his ‘divorced’ wife (which he indicated he wanted to), he would have to be apart from her for at least 100 days (OK, not too bad) and here was the (syariah-compliant?) crunch, the gatal sangat bullsh*t that covers the lust behind it, which I have to say, unfortunately demeaned the religion of Islam kau kau in the process.

Those elders decreed that the wife, Sohela must spent a night with another man and then be divorced by that opportunistic bonker.

Yes, there was no lack of ‘volunteers’, chief among whom undoubtedly were the ‘wise’ religious leaders.

But 30-year-old Aftab told those leaders to f-off. OK, maybe he didn’t but kaytee feels if he didn’t he ought to have, wakakaka.

Aftab said he had no intention of leaving his wife of 11 years. So in typical sour grapes those religious leaders who missed an opportunity to discharge their lusts on a probably pretty lady, ostracised the couple because of their refusal to abide by the decision of the 'wise' village leaders.

I know the Pakistani and West Bengali weren't as horrid as our Malaysian version of disguising murder as a jihad, but were just as criminally evil.

We need to be vigilant as Tuanku has been. Daulat Tuanku again.